Skip to main content

Expelled for a Crucifix

My Turning Point

The public hearings at the University of Havana during the so-called “Deepening Process” were some of the darkest days in our history. At the Faculty of Chemistry, classes stopped entirely; nothing was taught, nothing was learned. Attendance at the hearings was mandatory, and each day felt like walking into a tribunal rather than a university.

Many students were expelled. Charlie was not the only one. I remember a young woman—I can’t recall her name—who was cast out simply for wearing a crucifix. It had been a gift from her godmother. When the commission demanded she take it off, she refused. The leader pointed at the door, and instantly a chorus began: “Out, out, out!” Her classmates followed her to the street, chanting in what was called a “repudiation act.”

It was horrible to watch.

These acts were not spontaneous. They were an intimidation tactic perfected by the government. They could—and sometimes did—turn violent. The year before, in 1980, lives had already been lost during these orchestrated attacks. Human rights organizations abroad would later document them, but in that room, in that moment, we did not need anyone to tell us how real they were. We felt the fear in our bones.

The commission did not stop at the university gates. They sent inspectors into our neighborhoods, questioning our neighbors: Had we ever spoken against the revolution? Were we truly loyal, one hundred percent, without hesitation? A careless word, a false accusation, even silence could destroy you.

That same year, during the Mariel Boatlift, the government forced many Cubans onto boats bound for the United States. By the time the exodus ended, more than 125,000 people had gone. Their homes were left behind, ransacked, windows shattered, walls vandalized. In many cases, loyalists moved in and claimed them as their own.

For us students, the lesson was unmistakable: if entire families could be stripped of everything overnight, what chance did a single student have?

I remember sitting in the lecture hall where the hearings were held, waiting for my name to be read. I tried to think back—had I ever said something, even in private, that might mark me as a “dissident” and condemn me to expulsion?

I feared that if I were expelled, my home would become the target of a repudiation act, and my family would be forced to flee the country. My father was an army doctor; his career, his life’s work, could have been ruined by my words or actions.

In the end, the hearings concluded and my name was never called. I had not been accused of the crime of having an opinion. But I did not feel relief. I felt hollow, ashamed, devastated for all those students who had been sacrificed to politics—a kind of political assassination.

Looking back, I believe 1981 was my turning point.


Earlier: Our Charlie, Hegel

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Planner 00Iren

When I tell my daughters that their mother was amazing, I am not sure they grasp the magnitude of her stature. They tell me – “Yes dad, we know”. I remember the day I saw Christina the first time. It was in the halls of the chemistry department of Simon Fraser University. We both entered this long hallway at the same time, in opposite directions, in white lab coats, and we had the opportunity to take a good look at each other. When we passed our eyes crossed. She kept walking without turning but I looked back to see her disappear into one of the laboratories. “ Wow, I do not have a remote chance with that girl! ” Years later, after we reunited in Vancouver, she told me that she thought the same "- He is going to make a woman very happy one day"  - She told me that she had no idea that it was going to be her. After I received the ultimatum letter from Canada Immigration, I was left with no option but to escape to the United States and avoid deportation and possible impriso...

A Thousand Pictures, Three Remain

A thousand pictures, scattered wide, Moments frozen, side by side. Laughter, sunsets, faces bright, Fleeting echoes caught in light. Yet in the haze of time's embrace, Only three still hold their place. One of love, so pure, so true, One of loss, a tear in blue. One of hope—a flame so small, Yet the dearest one of all. Yes, you have guessed right; I was not having a perfect moment then I discovered these pictures in my Blogger picture drive; fresh air from the past.  I will sleep with a smile tonight.

Our Charlie, Hegel

It was 1981, and I had barely survived my first year at the University of Havana, where I was studying chemistry. The leap from high school to university had been a huge adjustment—not just for me, but for many others. In the fall of 1979, about 250 of us began the program together. By the second year, fewer than 50 remained. That year we were introduced to a new subject: Philosophy. Every subject has to start somewhere, and we began with the classics—their ideas, their conflicts, their strengths and weaknesses. But one question weighed heavily on us: why study philosophy at all? Shouldn’t we be focused on chemistry—the nature of substances, their reactions, the concepts of atoms, molecules, and bonds? That was the very first challenge we posed to our philosophy lecturer, and to us, it seemed perfectly legitimate. The answer, fittingly, was philosophical. In the Soviet context, philosophy was meant to train us in analytical reasoning and critical thinking—by grappling with big questi...